head to head · open source

one-api vs NSwag

one-api has 36,932 GitHub stars, 6,867 forks, 1,036 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. NSwag has 7,365 stars, 1,360 forks, 2,057 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. one-api leads on adoption by 401% (36,932 vs 7,365 stars). one-api is written in JavaScript under MIT; NSwag is written in C# under MIT. one-api has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, NSwag 18%. NSwag was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

one-api ★ 37K NSwag ★ 7.4K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

one-api NSwag
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 7.4K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript C#
Last push 2026-01-09 2026-09-07
Forks ⑂ 6.9K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick one-api if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full one-api profile →

pick NSwag if

  • You want the NSwag feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and NSwag fits your workflow better

full NSwag profile →

About one-api

One API is a self hosted LLM API management and key redistribution system that exposes many model providers through the standard OpenAI API format, aimed at developers, teams and operators who want a single endpoint, a single key model and a single quota surface across providers.

read the full one-api overview →

About NSwag

NSwag is an MIT licensed Swagger/OpenAPI 2.0 and 3.0 toolchain written in C for .NET, ASP.NET Core, and TypeScript developers who need to generate OpenAPI specifications from ASP.NET Web API controllers and generate C or TypeScript clients from those specifications.

read the full NSwag overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

one-api vs fastapi one-api vs Hoppscotch one-api vs Bruno one-api vs Insomnia one-api vs OpenAPI-Specification one-api vs openapi-generator one-api vs redoc one-api vs SafeLine one-api vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF one-api vs grpc-gateway one-api vs Yaak one-api vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is one-api or NSwag more popular?

one-api has 36,932 GitHub stars and NSwag has 7,365. one-api has the larger community by that measure.

Are one-api and NSwag free?

Both are open source. one-api is licensed under MIT and NSwag under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between one-api and NSwag?

one-api is written in JavaScript and NSwag in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, one-api or NSwag?

Choose one-api if you want the larger community (36,932 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose NSwag if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.