head to head · open source

one-api vs nba_api

one-api has 36,932 GitHub stars, 6,867 forks, 1,036 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. nba_api has 3,777 stars, 721 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. one-api leads on adoption by 878% (36,932 vs 3,777 stars). one-api is written in JavaScript under MIT; nba_api is written in Python under MIT. one-api has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, nba_api 19%. nba_api was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

one-api ★ 37K nba_api ★ 3.8K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

one-api nba_api
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 3.8K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-01-09 2026-08-16
Forks ⑂ 6.9K ⑂ 721
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick one-api if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full one-api profile →

pick nba_api if

  • You want the nba_api feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and nba_api fits your workflow better

full nba_api profile →

About one-api

One API is a self hosted LLM API management and key redistribution system that exposes many model providers through the standard OpenAI API format, aimed at developers, teams and operators who want a single endpoint, a single key model and a single quota surface across providers.

read the full one-api overview →

About nba_api

nba api is a Python package that acts as an API client for the web APIs used by NBA.com. It lives in the Python developer tools ecosystem and is distributed as an open source project under the MIT license. The package is designed to make official NBA.com data accessible through Python code, while also documenting the endpoints and parameters that the site exposes.

read the full nba_api overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

one-api vs fastapi one-api vs Hoppscotch one-api vs Bruno one-api vs Insomnia one-api vs OpenAPI-Specification one-api vs openapi-generator one-api vs redoc one-api vs SafeLine one-api vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF one-api vs grpc-gateway one-api vs Yaak one-api vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is one-api or nba_api more popular?

one-api has 36,932 GitHub stars and nba_api has 3,777. one-api has the larger community by that measure.

Are one-api and nba_api free?

Both are open source. one-api is licensed under MIT and nba_api under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between one-api and nba_api?

one-api is written in JavaScript and nba_api in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, one-api or nba_api?

Choose one-api if you want the larger community (36,932 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose nba_api if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.