head to head · open source

one-api vs fuego

one-api has 36,940 GitHub stars, 6,867 forks, 1,036 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. fuego has 1,775 stars, 129 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. one-api leads on adoption by 1,981% (36,940 vs 1,775 stars). one-api is written in JavaScript under MIT; fuego is written in Go under MIT. one-api has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, fuego 7%. fuego was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

one-api ★ 37K fuego ★ 1.8K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

one-api fuego
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 1.8K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-01-09 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 6.9K ⑂ 129
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick one-api if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full one-api profile →

pick fuego if

  • You want the fuego feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and fuego fits your workflow better

full fuego profile →

About one-api

One API is a self hosted LLM API management and key redistribution system that exposes many model providers through the standard OpenAI API format, aimed at developers, teams and operators who want a single endpoint, a single key model and a single quota surface across providers.

read the full one-api overview →

About fuego

Fuego is an MIT licensed, production ready Go web framework that generates an OpenAPI 3 specification directly from source code, aimed at Go developers building HTTP APIs and web applications who want their documentation to stay in sync with their handlers.

read the full fuego overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

one-api vs fastapi one-api vs Hoppscotch one-api vs Bruno one-api vs Insomnia one-api vs OpenAPI-Specification one-api vs openapi-generator one-api vs redoc one-api vs SafeLine one-api vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF one-api vs grpc-gateway one-api vs Yaak one-api vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is one-api or fuego more popular?

one-api has 36,940 GitHub stars and fuego has 1,775. one-api has the larger community by that measure.

Are one-api and fuego free?

Both are open source. one-api is licensed under MIT and fuego under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between one-api and fuego?

one-api is written in JavaScript and fuego in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, one-api or fuego?

Choose one-api if you want the larger community (36,940 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose fuego if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.