head to head · open source
obsidian-mind vs OpenWiki
obsidian-mind has 5,509 GitHub stars, 611 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. OpenWiki has 643 stars, 104 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. obsidian-mind leads on adoption by 757% (5,509 vs 643 stars). obsidian-mind is written in TypeScript under MIT; OpenWiki is written in Rust under MIT. obsidian-mind has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, OpenWiki 16%. obsidian-mind was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (knowledge-management), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| obsidian-mind | OpenWiki | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.5K | ★ 643 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-17 | 2026-10-07 |
| Forks | ⑂ 611 | ⑂ 104 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick obsidian-mind if
- You weight community size — 5.5K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick OpenWiki if
- You want the OpenWiki feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and OpenWiki fits your workflow better
About obsidian-mind
🌐 English 日本語 中文 한국어 Obsidian Mind An Obsidian vault that gives AI coding agents persistent memory. Built for Claude Code, with working hooks for Codex CLI and Gemini CLI. Start a session, talk about your day, and the agent handles the rest — notes, links, indexes, performance tracking. Every conversation builds on the last. 🔴 The Problem AI coding agents are powerful, but they forget. Every session starts from zero — no context on your goals, your team, your patterns, your wins. You re explain the same things. You lose decisions made three conversations ago. The knowledge never compounds. 🟢 The Solution Give…
read the full obsidian-mind overview →
About OpenWiki
Copy anything → popup appears on desktop → choose to keep → AI organizes it into a knowledge base You decide what to keep. AI makes sense of it. Privacy first — all data stored in local SQLite database. Network transparency: URL reading can send the full URL to Jina Reader, and the Chinese UI can send foreign language page text to Google Translate. Both are enabled by default for compatibility and can be disabled independently in Settings. Platform specific readers may still contact the source platform or its API. 🌐 Website · 中文文档 Screenshots Features 📋 Capture Popup A popup appears on your desktop when you…
read the full OpenWiki overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is obsidian-mind or OpenWiki more popular?
obsidian-mind has 5,509 GitHub stars and OpenWiki has 643. obsidian-mind has the larger community by that measure.
Are obsidian-mind and OpenWiki free?
Both are open source. obsidian-mind is licensed under MIT and OpenWiki under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between obsidian-mind and OpenWiki?
obsidian-mind is written in TypeScript and OpenWiki in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, obsidian-mind or OpenWiki?
Choose obsidian-mind if you want the larger community (5,509 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenWiki if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.