head to head · open source

obsidian-mind vs OpenWiki

obsidian-mind has 4,668 GitHub stars, 536 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. OpenWiki has 632 stars, 133 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. obsidian-mind leads on adoption by 639% (4,668 vs 632 stars). obsidian-mind is written in TypeScript under MIT; OpenWiki is written in Rust under MIT. obsidian-mind has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, OpenWiki 21%. OpenWiki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (knowledge-management), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

obsidian-mind ★ 4.7K OpenWiki ★ 632 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

obsidian-mind OpenWiki
GitHub stars ★ 4.7K ★ 632
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-02 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 536 ⑂ 133
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick obsidian-mind if

  • You weight community size — 4.7K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full obsidian-mind profile →

pick OpenWiki if

  • You want the OpenWiki feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and OpenWiki fits your workflow better

full OpenWiki profile →

About obsidian-mind

obsidian mind is a self organizing Obsidian vault template that gives AI coding agents persistent memory, built for developers and knowledge workers who run Claude Code, Codex CLI, or Gemini CLI and want every session to build on the last.

read the full obsidian-mind overview →

About OpenWiki

OpenWiki is a free, MIT licensed desktop application for macOS and Windows that watches what you copy, keeps only what you approve, and uses an AI provider of your choice to organise it into a personal wiki stored in a local SQLite database.

read the full OpenWiki overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

obsidian-mind vs AppFlowy obsidian-mind vs Memos obsidian-mind vs Joplin obsidian-mind vs SiYuan obsidian-mind vs Logseq obsidian-mind vs Outline obsidian-mind vs Open-Notebook obsidian-mind vs Khoj obsidian-mind vs Docmost obsidian-mind vs Tolaria obsidian-mind vs SurfSense obsidian-mind vs Zotero

Frequently asked questions

Is obsidian-mind or OpenWiki more popular?

obsidian-mind has 4,668 GitHub stars and OpenWiki has 632. obsidian-mind has the larger community by that measure.

Are obsidian-mind and OpenWiki free?

Both are open source. obsidian-mind is licensed under MIT and OpenWiki under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between obsidian-mind and OpenWiki?

obsidian-mind is written in TypeScript and OpenWiki in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, obsidian-mind or OpenWiki?

Choose obsidian-mind if you want the larger community (4,668 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenWiki if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.