head to head · open source

obscura vs browser-agent

obscura has 27,406 GitHub stars, 2,011 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped yesterday. browser-agent has 4,128 stars, 238 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. obscura leads on adoption by 564% (27,406 vs 4,128 stars). obscura is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; browser-agent is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. obscura has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, browser-agent 6%. obscura was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser, playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

obscura ★ 27K browser-agent ★ 4.1K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

obscura browser-agent
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 4.1K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-02-08
Forks ⑂ 2.0K ⑂ 238
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick obscura if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full obscura profile →

pick browser-agent if

  • You want the browser-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and browser-agent fits your workflow better

full browser-agent profile →

About obscura

Obscura is an open source headless browser engine written in Rust, built for web scraping and AI agent automation. It runs real JavaScript through V8, speaks the Chrome DevTools Protocol, and presents itself as a drop in replacement for headless Chrome when driven by Puppeteer or Playwright. The project lives in the browser automation and headless browser corner of the Rust ecosystem, and it ships under the Apache 2.0 license.

read the full obscura overview →

About browser-agent

Magnitude is an open source, vision first browser agent written in TypeScript that lets developers control a real browser with natural language, and it is aimed at engineers who need to automate repetitive web work, move data between applications that lack APIs, or test web interfaces rather than click through them by hand.

read the full browser-agent overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

playwright vs obscura vscode vs monaco-editor browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp playwright vs chrome-devtools-mcp puppeteer vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

obscura vs uBlock obscura vs Ladybird obscura vs chrome-devtools-mcp obscura vs monaco-editor obscura vs Zen Browser obscura vs servo obscura vs serenity obscura vs refined-github obscura vs slate obscura vs Avalonia obscura vs webtorrent obscura vs fingerprintjs

Frequently asked questions

Is obscura or browser-agent more popular?

obscura has 27,406 GitHub stars and browser-agent has 4,128. obscura has the larger community by that measure.

Are obscura and browser-agent free?

Both are open source. obscura is licensed under Apache-2.0 and browser-agent under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between obscura and browser-agent?

obscura is written in Rust and browser-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, obscura or browser-agent?

Choose obscura if you want the larger community (27,406 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose browser-agent if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.