head to head · open source

NvChad vs auto-dev

NvChad has 28,504 GitHub stars, 2,217 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. auto-dev has 4,548 stars, 502 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. NvChad leads on adoption by 527% (28,504 vs 4,548 stars). NvChad is written in Lua under GPL-3.0; auto-dev is written in Kotlin under MPL-2.0. NvChad has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, auto-dev 11%. auto-dev was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ide), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NvChad ★ 29K auto-dev ★ 4.5K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

NvChad auto-dev
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 4.5K
License GPL-3.0 MPL-2.0
Written in Lua Kotlin
Last push 2026-07-03 2026-09-25
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 502
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NvChad if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NvChad profile →

pick auto-dev if

  • You want the auto-dev feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and auto-dev fits your workflow better

full auto-dev profile →

About NvChad

NvChad is a Neovim configuration framework written in Lua that provides a base configuration with polished defaults and a beautiful UI, aimed at developers who want a fast, preconfigured editor without assembling a configuration from scratch.

read the full NvChad overview →

About auto-dev

AutoDev is an AI native, multi agent development platform built on Kotlin Multiplatform that lets developers run coding, review, and document workflows from IntelliJ IDEA, VS Code, the CLI, desktop, mobile, or the web.

read the full auto-dev overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 270K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 211K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

NvChad vs vscode NvChad vs Neovim NvChad vs Zed NvChad vs code-server NvChad vs helix NvChad vs vscodium NvChad vs Kilo NvChad vs CodeEdit NvChad vs opcode NvChad vs devpod NvChad vs platformio-core NvChad vs spyder

Frequently asked questions

Is NvChad or auto-dev more popular?

NvChad has 28,504 GitHub stars and auto-dev has 4,548. NvChad has the larger community by that measure.

Are NvChad and auto-dev free?

Both are open source. NvChad is licensed under GPL-3.0 and auto-dev under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NvChad and auto-dev?

NvChad is written in Lua and auto-dev in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NvChad or auto-dev?

Choose NvChad if you want the larger community (28,504 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose auto-dev if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.