head to head · open source

NvChad vs Kilo

NvChad has 28,490 GitHub stars, 2,218 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Kilo has 27,369 stars, 3,178 forks, 586 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NvChad leads on adoption by 4% (28,490 vs 27,369 stars). NvChad is written in Lua under GPL-3.0; Kilo is written in TypeScript under MIT. NvChad has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Kilo 12%. Kilo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NvChad ★ 28K Kilo ★ 27K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

NvChad Kilo
GitHub stars ★ 28K ★ 27K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Lua TypeScript
Last push 2026-07-03 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 3.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NvChad if

  • You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NvChad profile →

pick Kilo if

  • You want the Kilo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Kilo fits your workflow better

full Kilo profile →

About NvChad

NvChad is a Neovim configuration framework written in Lua that provides a base configuration with polished defaults and a beautiful UI, aimed at developers who want a fast, preconfigured editor without assembling a configuration from scratch.

read the full NvChad overview →

About Kilo

Kilo is an open source AI coding agent platform that integrates into VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, the CLI, and cloud environments. It enables developers to build, ship, and iterate faster by acting as an autonomous or semi autonomous coding assistant across their entire workflow. Built in TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it supports 500+ models—including GPT 5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview—without vendor lock in or markup.

read the full Kilo overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

react vs kilocode react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

NvChad vs vscode NvChad vs Neovim NvChad vs Zed NvChad vs code-server NvChad vs helix NvChad vs vscodium NvChad vs CodeEdit NvChad vs opcode NvChad vs devpod NvChad vs terax-ai NvChad vs lite-xl NvChad vs react-ace

Frequently asked questions

Is NvChad or Kilo more popular?

NvChad has 28,490 GitHub stars and Kilo has 27,369. NvChad has the larger community by that measure.

Are NvChad and Kilo free?

Both are open source. NvChad is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Kilo under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NvChad and Kilo?

NvChad is written in Lua and Kilo in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NvChad or Kilo?

Choose NvChad if you want the larger community (28,490 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Kilo if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.