head to head · open source

NocoBase vs Woodpecker CI

NocoBase has 24,256 GitHub stars, 2,876 forks, 307 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Woodpecker CI has 7,886 stars, 679 forks, 371 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NocoBase leads on adoption by 208% (24,256 vs 7,886 stars). NocoBase is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Woodpecker CI is written in Go under Apache-2.0. NocoBase has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Woodpecker CI 9%. NocoBase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoBase ★ 24K Woodpecker CI ★ 7.9K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoBase Woodpecker CI
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 7.9K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 679
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoBase if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoBase profile →

pick Woodpecker CI if

  • You want the Woodpecker CI feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Woodpecker CI fits your workflow better

full Woodpecker CI profile →

About NocoBase

NocoBase is an open source AI plus no code platform, written in TypeScript, for teams and non developers who need to build and run internal business systems such as admin dashboards, CRM, and ERP tooling.

read the full NocoBase overview →

About Woodpecker CI

Woodpecker CI is a continuous integration and continuous delivery engine written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It lives in the developer tooling ecosystem around build and deployment automation, and it is distributed as a self hostable server plus one or more agents that execute pipeline work. The project describes itself as a simple, yet powerful CI/CD engine with great extensibility, and it is catalogued under topics such as automation, ci, cicd, devops, docker, and kubernetes. Its documentation and plugin directory are hosted at woodpecker ci.org.

read the full Woodpecker CI overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

NocoBase vs vite NocoBase vs webpack NocoBase vs Appwrite NocoBase vs parcel NocoBase vs Harness NocoBase vs Dokku NocoBase vs turborepo NocoBase vs nx NocoBase vs gradle NocoBase vs rspack NocoBase vs devbox NocoBase vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoBase or Woodpecker CI more popular?

NocoBase has 24,256 GitHub stars and Woodpecker CI has 7,886. NocoBase has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoBase and Woodpecker CI free?

Both are open source. NocoBase has no licence declared in this registry, and Woodpecker CI is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoBase and Woodpecker CI?

NocoBase is written in TypeScript and Woodpecker CI in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoBase or Woodpecker CI?

Choose NocoBase if you want the larger community (24,256 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Woodpecker CI if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.