head to head · open source

nnn vs resticprofile

nnn has 21,895 GitHub stars, 817 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. resticprofile has 1,420 stars, 69 forks, 99 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. nnn leads on adoption by 1,442% (21,895 vs 1,420 stars). nnn is written in C under BSD-2-Clause; resticprofile is written in Go under GPL-3.0. nnn has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, resticprofile 5%. nnn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nnn ★ 22K resticprofile ★ 1.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

nnn resticprofile
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 1.4K
License BSD-2-Clause GPL-3.0
Written in C Go
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-07-10
Forks ⑂ 817 ⑂ 69
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nnn if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nnn profile →

pick resticprofile if

  • You want the resticprofile feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and resticprofile fits your workflow better

full resticprofile profile →

About nnn

nnn (n³) is a tiny, nearly zero config terminal file manager written in C and released under the BSD 2 Clause licence, built for developers, sysadmins, and command line users who want fast filesystem browsing, disk usage analysis, batch renaming, and file picking without leaving the shell.

read the full nnn overview →

About resticprofile

resticprofile is a GPL 3.0 configuration profiles manager and scheduler for the restic backup tool, written in Go, intended for administrators and teams who run restic jobs on a schedule and want those jobs described in a configuration file rather than reconstructed from command line history.

read the full resticprofile overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit excalidraw vs mole rustdesk vs mole excalidraw vs pearcleaner excalidraw vs bleachbit rustdesk vs pearcleaner openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More System Cleanup & Optimization projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the System Cleanup & Optimization field.

nnn vs Mole nnn vs Pearcleaner nnn vs BleachBit nnn vs dua-cli nnn vs gdu nnn vs RyTuneX nnn vs pomatez nnn vs memories nnn vs portabase nnn vs curbox-android

Frequently asked questions

Is nnn or resticprofile more popular?

nnn has 21,895 GitHub stars and resticprofile has 1,420. nnn has the larger community by that measure.

Are nnn and resticprofile free?

Both are open source. nnn is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and resticprofile under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nnn and resticprofile?

nnn is written in C and resticprofile in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nnn or resticprofile?

Choose nnn if you want the larger community (21,895 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose resticprofile if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.