head to head · open source

Nextcloud vs ranger

Nextcloud has 36,863 GitHub stars, 5,232 forks, 3,657 open issues and last shipped today. ranger has 17,405 stars, 942 forks, 896 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Nextcloud leads on adoption by 112% (36,863 vs 17,405 stars). Nextcloud is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0; ranger is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Nextcloud has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, ranger 5%. Nextcloud was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Nextcloud ★ 37K ranger ★ 17K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Nextcloud ranger
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 17K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in PHP Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 942
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Nextcloud if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Nextcloud profile →

pick ranger if

  • You want the ranger feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ranger fits your workflow better

full ranger profile →

About Nextcloud

Nextcloud is a self hosted cloud collaboration platform built in PHP, licensed under AGPL 3.0. It enables organizations and individuals to store, synchronize, and share files, contacts, calendars, and other data on infrastructure they control, replacing reliance on third party cloud services. The project lives in the open source cloud software ecosystem and serves as a decentralized alternative to proprietary suites like Dropbox, Google Workspace, and Microsoft 365.

read the full Nextcloud overview →

About ranger

Ranger is a console file manager with VI key bindings, written in Python and released under the GNU General Public License version 3, for terminal users who want to browse, preview, and manipulate files without leaving a Unix shell.

read the full ranger overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Nextcloud vs LocalSend Nextcloud vs rclone Nextcloud vs copyparty Nextcloud vs Files Nextcloud vs yazi Nextcloud vs Spacedrive Nextcloud vs uppy Nextcloud vs cloudreve Nextcloud vs superfile Nextcloud vs Seafile Nextcloud vs PairDrop Nextcloud vs dufs

Frequently asked questions

Is Nextcloud or ranger more popular?

Nextcloud has 36,863 GitHub stars and ranger has 17,405. Nextcloud has the larger community by that measure.

Are Nextcloud and ranger free?

Both are open source. Nextcloud is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ranger under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Nextcloud and ranger?

Nextcloud is written in PHP and ranger in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Nextcloud or ranger?

Choose Nextcloud if you want the larger community (36,863 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ranger if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.