head to head · open source
nextai-translator vs competitive-companion
nextai-translator has 25,019 GitHub stars, 1,854 forks, 529 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. competitive-companion has 1,340 stars, 220 forks, 90 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. nextai-translator leads on adoption by 1,767% (25,019 vs 1,340 stars). nextai-translator is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; competitive-companion is written in TypeScript under MIT. nextai-translator has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, competitive-companion 16%. nextai-translator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| nextai-translator | competitive-companion | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 25K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 220 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick nextai-translator if
- You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick competitive-companion if
- You want the competitive-companion feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and competitive-companion fits your workflow better
About nextai-translator
Due to receiving a trademark ownership warning from OpenAI, this project and product has been renamed to nextai translator. We hope you understand. English 中文 The translator that does more than just translation Why Yet another Translator I have developed a Bob plugin that utilizes ChatGPT API to provide global word translation on macOS. However, since not all users have access to macOS to benefit from the plugin, I have created this project! More than just a browser extension What began as a Chrome extension has now evolved into a multi platform desktop app that I am currently developing. More than just…
read the full nextai-translator overview →
About competitive-companion
Competitive Companion [link cws]: [link amo]: [ ][link cws] [ ][link cws] [ ][link cws] [ ][link amo] [ ][link amo] [ ][link amo] A browser extension which parses competitive programming problems from various online judges (like AtCoder and Codeforces) and sends them to various tools (like CP Editor and CPH). Capable of parsing problems and contests and extracting data like the example testcases and the time and memory constraints. Install [ Chrome extension][link cws] [ ][link cws] [ Firefox add on][link amo] [ ][link amo] Tools that use Competitive Companion acmX AI Virtual Assistant Assistant.nvim AutoCp…
read the full competitive-companion overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is nextai-translator or competitive-companion more popular?
nextai-translator has 25,019 GitHub stars and competitive-companion has 1,340. nextai-translator has the larger community by that measure.
Are nextai-translator and competitive-companion free?
Both are open source. nextai-translator is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and competitive-companion under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between nextai-translator and competitive-companion?
nextai-translator is written in TypeScript and competitive-companion in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, nextai-translator or competitive-companion?
Choose nextai-translator if you want the larger community (25,019 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose competitive-companion if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.