head to head · open source
codex-security vs NeuroSploit
codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars, 903 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NeuroSploit has 1,499 stars, 357 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. codex-security leads on adoption by 653% (11,287 vs 1,499 stars). codex-security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; NeuroSploit is written in Rust under MIT. codex-security has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, NeuroSploit 24%. codex-security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-security, cybersecurity), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| codex-security | NeuroSploit | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 11K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 903 | ⑂ 357 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick codex-security if
- You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick NeuroSploit if
- You want the NeuroSploit feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and NeuroSploit fits your workflow better
About codex-security
Codex Security @openai/codex security is a CLI and TypeScript SDK for defining security policy and finding, validating, and fixing security vulnerabilities in your code. 👉👉 See the Codex Security documentation for full documentation. Some cybersecurity requests and protected findings require approval through Trusted Access for Cyber. To join the program, visit chatgpt.com/cyber. Quick start Requires Node.js 22.13.0 or later and Python 3.10 or later. For CI, set OPENAI API KEY instead of signing in. Generate SECURITY.md Draft repository wide or component scoped SECURITY.md guidance for future scans: The command…
read the full codex-security overview →
About NeuroSploit
🧠 NeuroSploit v4.4.0 Autonomous, multi model penetration testing harness — Rust, CLI first. by Joas A Santos & Red Team Leaders What is NeuroSploit? NeuroSploit is an autonomous penetration testing tool. You point it at a target; it does the security assessment on its own and hands you a report — recon, exploitation, chaining findings into real impact, and validation, with no human driving each step. The key idea: the harness is the pentester, not the model. Instead of asking one LLM to "hack this", a Rust engine runs the methodology — it picks the right specialist agents for what it finds, runs them in…
read the full NeuroSploit overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is codex-security or NeuroSploit more popular?
codex-security has 11,287 GitHub stars and NeuroSploit has 1,499. codex-security has the larger community by that measure.
Are codex-security and NeuroSploit free?
Both are open source. codex-security is licensed under Apache-2.0 and NeuroSploit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between codex-security and NeuroSploit?
codex-security is written in TypeScript and NeuroSploit in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, codex-security or NeuroSploit?
Choose codex-security if you want the larger community (11,287 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose NeuroSploit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.