head to head · open source

nanobrowser vs hermes-browser-extension

nanobrowser has 13,810 GitHub stars, 1,459 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. hermes-browser-extension has 1,542 stars, 147 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. nanobrowser leads on adoption by 796% (13,810 vs 1,542 stars). nanobrowser is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; hermes-browser-extension is written in JavaScript under MIT. nanobrowser has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, hermes-browser-extension 10%. hermes-browser-extension was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chrome-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nanobrowser ★ 14K hermes-browser-extension ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

nanobrowser hermes-browser-extension
GitHub stars ★ 14K ★ 1.5K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-08-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 147
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nanobrowser if

  • You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nanobrowser profile →

pick hermes-browser-extension if

  • You want the hermes-browser-extension feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and hermes-browser-extension fits your workflow better

full hermes-browser-extension profile →

About nanobrowser

Nanobrowser is an open source Chrome extension for AI powered web automation that runs multi agent workflows inside your own browser using your own LLM API key, built for people who want Operator style browser agents without a subscription.

read the full nanobrowser overview →

About hermes-browser-extension

Hermes Browser Extension is a Chrome, Edge, and Chromium side panel that connects the web page a user is viewing to a real Hermes Agent runtime, whether that runtime runs locally or on a gateway the user controls.

read the full hermes-browser-extension overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

vscode vs monaco-editor browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp playwright vs chrome-devtools-mcp puppeteer vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs ladybird playwright vs obscura ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

nanobrowser vs uBlock nanobrowser vs Ladybird nanobrowser vs chrome-devtools-mcp nanobrowser vs monaco-editor nanobrowser vs Zen Browser nanobrowser vs servo nanobrowser vs serenity nanobrowser vs refined-github nanobrowser vs slate nanobrowser vs Avalonia nanobrowser vs webtorrent nanobrowser vs fingerprintjs

Frequently asked questions

Is nanobrowser or hermes-browser-extension more popular?

nanobrowser has 13,810 GitHub stars and hermes-browser-extension has 1,542. nanobrowser has the larger community by that measure.

Are nanobrowser and hermes-browser-extension free?

Both are open source. nanobrowser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and hermes-browser-extension under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nanobrowser and hermes-browser-extension?

nanobrowser is written in TypeScript and hermes-browser-extension in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nanobrowser or hermes-browser-extension?

Choose nanobrowser if you want the larger community (13,810 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose hermes-browser-extension if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.