head to head · open source
monaco-editor vs competitive-companion
monaco-editor has 46,944 GitHub stars, 4,167 forks, 859 open issues and last shipped yesterday. competitive-companion has 1,339 stars, 220 forks, 90 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. monaco-editor leads on adoption by 3,406% (46,944 vs 1,339 stars). monaco-editor is written in JavaScript under MIT; competitive-companion is written in TypeScript under MIT. monaco-editor has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, competitive-companion 16%. monaco-editor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| monaco-editor | competitive-companion | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 220 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick monaco-editor if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick competitive-companion if
- You want the competitive-companion feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and competitive-companion fits your workflow better
About monaco-editor
Monaco Editor The Monaco Editor is the fully featured code editor from VS Code. Check out the VS Code docs to see some of the supported features. Try it out Try out the editor and see various examples in our interactive playground. The playground is the best way to learn about how to use the editor, which features is supports, to try out different versions and to create minimal reproducible examples for bug reports. Installing You will get: inside /esm : ESM version of the editor (compatible with e.g. webpack) monaco.d.ts : this specifies the API of the editor (this is what is actually versioned, everything else…
read the full monaco-editor overview →
About competitive-companion
Competitive Companion [link cws]: [link amo]: [ ][link cws] [ ][link cws] [ ][link cws] [ ][link amo] [ ][link amo] [ ][link amo] A browser extension which parses competitive programming problems from various online judges (like AtCoder and Codeforces) and sends them to various tools (like CP Editor and CPH). Capable of parsing problems and contests and extracting data like the example testcases and the time and memory constraints. Install [ Chrome extension][link cws] [ ][link cws] [ Firefox add on][link amo] [ ][link amo] Tools that use Competitive Companion acmX AI Virtual Assistant Assistant.nvim AutoCp…
read the full competitive-companion overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is monaco-editor or competitive-companion more popular?
monaco-editor has 46,944 GitHub stars and competitive-companion has 1,339. monaco-editor has the larger community by that measure.
Are monaco-editor and competitive-companion free?
Both are open source. monaco-editor is licensed under MIT and competitive-companion under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between monaco-editor and competitive-companion?
monaco-editor is written in JavaScript and competitive-companion in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, monaco-editor or competitive-companion?
Choose monaco-editor if you want the larger community (46,944 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose competitive-companion if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.