head to head · open source
monaco-editor vs archiveweb.page
monaco-editor has 46,944 GitHub stars, 4,167 forks, 859 open issues and last shipped yesterday. archiveweb.page has 1,611 stars, 116 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. monaco-editor leads on adoption by 2,814% (46,944 vs 1,611 stars). monaco-editor is written in JavaScript under MIT; archiveweb.page is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. monaco-editor has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, archiveweb.page 7%. monaco-editor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| monaco-editor | archiveweb.page | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 116 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick monaco-editor if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick archiveweb.page if
- You want the archiveweb.page feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and archiveweb.page fits your workflow better
About monaco-editor
Monaco Editor The Monaco Editor is the fully featured code editor from VS Code. Check out the VS Code docs to see some of the supported features. Try it out Try out the editor and see various examples in our interactive playground. The playground is the best way to learn about how to use the editor, which features is supports, to try out different versions and to create minimal reproducible examples for bug reports. Installing You will get: inside /esm : ESM version of the editor (compatible with e.g. webpack) monaco.d.ts : this specifies the API of the editor (this is what is actually versioned, everything else…
read the full monaco-editor overview →
About archiveweb.page
ArchiveWeb.page is a JavaScript based application for interactive, high fidelity web archiving that runs directly in the browser. The system can be used as a Chrome/Chromium based browser extension and also as a standalone Electron app. The system creates, stores, and replays high fidelity web archives stored directly in the browser's storage (via IndexedDB). For more detailed info on how to use the extension and standalone app, see the ArchiveWeb.page User Guide. The browser extension is available on the Chrome Web Store. Downloads for the desktop are are available on the GitHub Releases page. Architecture The…
read the full archiveweb.page overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is monaco-editor or archiveweb.page more popular?
monaco-editor has 46,944 GitHub stars and archiveweb.page has 1,611. monaco-editor has the larger community by that measure.
Are monaco-editor and archiveweb.page free?
Both are open source. monaco-editor is licensed under MIT and archiveweb.page under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between monaco-editor and archiveweb.page?
monaco-editor is written in JavaScript and archiveweb.page in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, monaco-editor or archiveweb.page?
Choose monaco-editor if you want the larger community (46,944 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose archiveweb.page if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.