head to head · open source

Mastodon vs omnom

Mastodon has 50,299 GitHub stars, 7,498 forks, 4,525 open issues and last shipped yesterday. omnom has 663 stars, 41 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Mastodon leads on adoption by 7,487% (50,299 vs 663 stars). Mastodon is written in Ruby under AGPL-3.0; omnom is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Mastodon has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, omnom 6%. Mastodon was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (activitypub, fediverse), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Mastodon ★ 50K omnom ★ 663 category Community & Social

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Mastodon omnom
GitHub stars ★ 50K ★ 663
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Ruby Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-06-22
Forks ⑂ 7.5K ⑂ 41
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Mastodon if

  • You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Mastodon profile →

pick omnom if

  • You want the omnom feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and omnom fits your workflow better

full omnom profile →

About Mastodon

Mastodon is a free, open source, self hosted social network server built on ActivityPub that lets anyone run a microblogging community which interoperates with the wider Fediverse, and it is aimed at individuals, communities, and organisations that want to own their social graph instead of renting it from a platform.

read the full Mastodon overview →

About omnom

Omnom is a self hosted, AGPL 3.0 web content preservation service written in Go that bookmarks pages together with browser rendered snapshots, aggregates feeds, and follows ActivityPub streams, built for individuals and small teams who want their reading, archiving, and fediverse following to live on infrastructure they control.

read the full omnom overview →

More in Community & Social

maigret ★ 38K glance ★ 37K Bluesky ★ 18K Lemmy ★ 15K giscus ★ 12K owncast ★ 12K

Related comparisons

mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs glance mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey mastodon vs core maigret vs glance giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs fider giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review

More Social Networking projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Social Networking field.

Mastodon vs maigret Mastodon vs glance Mastodon vs Bluesky Mastodon vs Lemmy Mastodon vs owncast Mastodon vs misskey Mastodon vs core Mastodon vs Pixelfed Mastodon vs Infinity-For-Reddit Mastodon vs writefreely Mastodon vs Reddit-Enhancement-Suite Mastodon vs praw

Frequently asked questions

Is Mastodon or omnom more popular?

Mastodon has 50,299 GitHub stars and omnom has 663. Mastodon has the larger community by that measure.

Are Mastodon and omnom free?

Both are open source. Mastodon is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and omnom under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Mastodon and omnom?

Mastodon is written in Ruby and omnom in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Mastodon or omnom?

Choose Mastodon if you want the larger community (50,299 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose omnom if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.