head to head · open source

lux vs CloakBrowser

lux has 31,686 GitHub stars, 3,312 forks, 545 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. CloakBrowser has 31,528 stars, 2,612 forks, 224 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. lux leads on adoption by 1% (31,686 vs 31,528 stars). lux is written in Go under MIT; CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT. lux has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, CloakBrowser 8%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lux ★ 32K CloakBrowser ★ 32K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

lux CloakBrowser
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 32K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-03-29 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 2.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lux if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lux profile →

pick CloakBrowser if

  • You want the CloakBrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and CloakBrowser fits your workflow better

full CloakBrowser profile →

About lux

Lux is a video download library and command line tool written in Go, released under the MIT license. It ships as a single lux binary that takes one or more URLs and retrieves the underlying media streams, and it also exposes the downloading logic as a Go library that other programs can embed. The project has existed for roughly nine years and lives in the Go ecosystem, distributed through go install alongside the usual operating system package managers.

read the full lux overview →

About CloakBrowser

CloakBrowser is a stealth Chromium build for Python and JavaScript teams that need browser automation to survive bot detection systems, aimed at scraping and AI agent engineers who want to replace Playwright or Puppeteer without rewriting their code.

read the full CloakBrowser overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

crawl4ai vs lux crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

lux vs Crawl4AI lux vs Scrapling lux vs scrapy lux vs EasySpider lux vs changedetection.io lux vs Scrapegraph-ai lux vs crawlee lux vs colly lux vs stagehand lux vs proxy_pool lux vs Douyin_TikTok_Download_API lux vs katana

Frequently asked questions

Is lux or CloakBrowser more popular?

lux has 31,686 GitHub stars and CloakBrowser has 31,528. lux has the larger community by that measure.

Are lux and CloakBrowser free?

Both are open source. lux is licensed under MIT and CloakBrowser under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lux and CloakBrowser?

lux is written in Go and CloakBrowser in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lux or CloakBrowser?

Choose lux if you want the larger community (31,686 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose CloakBrowser if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.