head to head · open source

loopx vs daml

loopx has 6,548 GitHub stars, 619 forks, 102 open issues and last shipped yesterday. daml has 924 stars, 265 forks, 753 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. loopx leads on adoption by 609% (6,548 vs 924 stars). loopx is written in Python under Apache-2.0; daml is written in Haskell under Apache-2.0. loopx has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, daml 29%. loopx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

loopx ★ 6.5K daml ★ 924 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

loopx daml
GitHub stars ★ 6.5K ★ 924
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python Haskell
Last push 2026-11-04 2026-11-03
Forks ⑂ 619 ⑂ 265
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick loopx if

  • You weight community size — 6.5K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full loopx profile →

pick daml if

  • You want the daml feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Haskell
  • You evaluated both and daml fits your workflow better

full daml profile →

About loopx

LoopX The open, provider neutral, stateful control plane for long horizon agents. Runs on top of Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, and other agent harnesses. LoopX preserves objectives, gates, todos, evidence, quota, and handoffs across turns; the harness executes bounded work. Public website · Blog · Docs · Developer Book · Try LoopX · See real loops · How it works · 简体中文 Open and provider neutral, LoopX is a lightweight state kernel and local first control plane for loop engineering. It runs on top of different agent harnesses rather than replacing them, providing the long horizon state, semantic decisions about…

read the full loopx overview →

About daml

See full README at sdk/README.md

read the full daml overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

Frequently asked questions

Is loopx or daml more popular?

loopx has 6,548 GitHub stars and daml has 924. loopx has the larger community by that measure.

Are loopx and daml free?

Both are open source. loopx is licensed under Apache-2.0 and daml under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between loopx and daml?

loopx is written in Python and daml in Haskell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, loopx or daml?

Choose loopx if you want the larger community (6,548 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose daml if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.