head to head · open source

Logseq vs Zen

Logseq has 44,955 GitHub stars, 2,815 forks, 942 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Zen has 1,174 stars, 61 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Logseq leads on adoption by 3,729% (44,955 vs 1,174 stars). Logseq is written in Clojure under AGPL-3.0; Zen is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. Logseq has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Zen 5%. Logseq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (markdown), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Logseq ★ 45K Zen ★ 1.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Logseq Zen
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 1.2K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Clojure JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 61
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Logseq if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Clojure
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Logseq profile →

pick Zen if

  • You want the Zen feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Zen fits your workflow better

full Zen profile →

About Logseq

Logseq is an open source, privacy first knowledge management platform built for local first workflows. It runs as a desktop application and web interface, storing data locally in Markdown or Org mode files, with optional SQLite backed DB graphs for advanced features. The project lives in the Clojure/ClojureScript ecosystem and is licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full Logseq overview →

About Zen

Zen is a self hosted note taking application that ships as a single Go binary or as a Docker Compose stack. Notes are written and stored as standard Markdown, with the content and its metadata kept in a local SQLite database. The project sits in the self hosted productivity and knowledge management ecosystem, alongside other personal note servers, and it presents itself as clean, distraction free, and lightweight by design.

read the full Zen overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

appflowy vs logseq appflowy vs memos appflowy vs joplin appflowy vs siyuan memos vs joplin appflowy vs outline appflowy vs open-notebook appflowy vs khoj n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Logseq vs AppFlowy Logseq vs Memos Logseq vs Joplin Logseq vs SiYuan Logseq vs Outline Logseq vs Open-Notebook Logseq vs Khoj Logseq vs Docmost Logseq vs Tolaria Logseq vs SurfSense Logseq vs Zotero Logseq vs Notesnook

Frequently asked questions

Is Logseq or Zen more popular?

Logseq has 44,955 GitHub stars and Zen has 1,174. Logseq has the larger community by that measure.

Are Logseq and Zen free?

Both are open source. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Zen under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Logseq and Zen?

Logseq is written in Clojure and Zen in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Logseq or Zen?

Choose Logseq if you want the larger community (44,955 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Zen if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.