head to head · open source

Logseq vs XWiki

Logseq has 44,955 GitHub stars, 2,815 forks, 942 open issues and last shipped yesterday. XWiki has 1,311 stars, 663 forks, 218 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Logseq leads on adoption by 3,329% (44,955 vs 1,311 stars). Logseq is written in Clojure under AGPL-3.0; XWiki is written in Java under LGPL-2.1. Logseq has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, XWiki 51%. XWiki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Logseq ★ 45K XWiki ★ 1.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Logseq XWiki
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 1.3K
License AGPL-3.0 LGPL-2.1
Written in Clojure Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 663
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Logseq if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Clojure
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Logseq profile →

pick XWiki if

  • You want the XWiki feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-2.1 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and XWiki fits your workflow better

full XWiki profile →

About Logseq

Logseq is an open source, privacy first knowledge management platform built for local first workflows. It runs as a desktop application and web interface, storing data locally in Markdown or Org mode files, with optional SQLite backed DB graphs for advanced features. The project lives in the Clojure/ClojureScript ecosystem and is licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full Logseq overview →

About XWiki

XWiki is an open source knowledge management and collaboration platform written in Java and licensed under LGPL 2.1. It is described as a generic wiki platform, and it lives in the Productivity & Utilities / Note Taking & Knowledge Management category. The project is part of the XWiki.org software forge, where XWiki Commons, XWiki Rendering, and XWiki Platform are released together and share the same version.

read the full XWiki overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

appflowy vs logseq appflowy vs memos appflowy vs joplin appflowy vs siyuan memos vs joplin appflowy vs outline appflowy vs open-notebook appflowy vs khoj n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Logseq vs AppFlowy Logseq vs Memos Logseq vs Joplin Logseq vs SiYuan Logseq vs Outline Logseq vs Open-Notebook Logseq vs Khoj Logseq vs Docmost Logseq vs Tolaria Logseq vs SurfSense Logseq vs Zotero Logseq vs Notesnook

Frequently asked questions

Is Logseq or XWiki more popular?

Logseq has 44,955 GitHub stars and XWiki has 1,311. Logseq has the larger community by that measure.

Are Logseq and XWiki free?

Both are open source. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and XWiki under LGPL-2.1. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Logseq and XWiki?

Logseq is written in Clojure and XWiki in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Logseq or XWiki?

Choose Logseq if you want the larger community (44,955 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose XWiki if its feature set, stack or LGPL-2.1 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.