head to head · open source

Logseq vs Standard Notes

Logseq has 44,955 GitHub stars, 2,815 forks, 942 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Standard Notes has 6,633 stars, 551 forks, 99 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Logseq leads on adoption by 578% (44,955 vs 6,633 stars). Logseq is written in Clojure under AGPL-3.0; Standard Notes is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Logseq has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Standard Notes 8%. Logseq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (markdown, note-taking), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Logseq ★ 45K Standard Notes ★ 6.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Logseq Standard Notes
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 6.6K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Clojure TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 551
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Logseq if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Clojure
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Logseq profile →

pick Standard Notes if

  • You want the Standard Notes feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Standard Notes fits your workflow better

full Standard Notes profile →

About Logseq

Logseq is an open source, privacy first knowledge management platform built for local first workflows. It runs as a desktop application and web interface, storing data locally in Markdown or Org mode files, with optional SQLite backed DB graphs for advanced features. The project lives in the Clojure/ClojureScript ecosystem and is licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full Logseq overview →

About Standard Notes

Standard Notes is an end to end encrypted note taking application for individuals and professionals who want to capture notes, files, and long term work in a place only they can read, with clients on Mac, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, and the web.

read the full Standard Notes overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

appflowy vs logseq appflowy vs memos appflowy vs joplin appflowy vs siyuan memos vs joplin appflowy vs outline appflowy vs open-notebook appflowy vs khoj n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Logseq vs AppFlowy Logseq vs Memos Logseq vs Joplin Logseq vs SiYuan Logseq vs Outline Logseq vs Open-Notebook Logseq vs Khoj Logseq vs Docmost Logseq vs Tolaria Logseq vs SurfSense Logseq vs Zotero Logseq vs Notesnook

Frequently asked questions

Is Logseq or Standard Notes more popular?

Logseq has 44,955 GitHub stars and Standard Notes has 6,633. Logseq has the larger community by that measure.

Are Logseq and Standard Notes free?

Both are open source. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Standard Notes under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Logseq and Standard Notes?

Logseq is written in Clojure and Standard Notes in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Logseq or Standard Notes?

Choose Logseq if you want the larger community (44,955 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Standard Notes if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.