head to head · open source

Logseq vs OpenNotas

Logseq has 44,955 GitHub stars, 2,815 forks, 942 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenNotas has 179 stars, 19 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Logseq leads on adoption by 25,015% (44,955 vs 179 stars). Logseq is written in Clojure under AGPL-3.0; OpenNotas is written in Vue under a custom or non-standard licence. Logseq has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, OpenNotas 11%. Logseq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Logseq ★ 45K OpenNotas ★ 179 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Logseq OpenNotas
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 179
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in Clojure Vue
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-06
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 19
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Logseq if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Clojure
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Logseq profile →

pick OpenNotas if

  • You want the OpenNotas feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You evaluated both and OpenNotas fits your workflow better

full OpenNotas profile →

About Logseq

Logseq is an open source, privacy first knowledge management platform built for local first workflows. It runs as a desktop application and web interface, storing data locally in Markdown or Org mode files, with optional SQLite backed DB graphs for advanced features. The project lives in the Clojure/ClojureScript ecosystem and is licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full Logseq overview →

About OpenNotas

OpenNotas is a free, open source, cross platform personal note taking application delivered as a Progressive Web App for anyone who wants to capture text and Markdown notes quickly on mobile or desktop without paying for a subscription.

read the full OpenNotas overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

appflowy vs logseq appflowy vs memos appflowy vs joplin appflowy vs siyuan memos vs joplin appflowy vs outline appflowy vs open-notebook appflowy vs khoj n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Logseq vs AppFlowy Logseq vs Memos Logseq vs Joplin Logseq vs SiYuan Logseq vs Outline Logseq vs Open-Notebook Logseq vs Khoj Logseq vs Docmost Logseq vs Tolaria Logseq vs SurfSense Logseq vs Zotero Logseq vs Notesnook

Frequently asked questions

Is Logseq or OpenNotas more popular?

Logseq has 44,955 GitHub stars and OpenNotas has 179. Logseq has the larger community by that measure.

Are Logseq and OpenNotas free?

Both are open source. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and OpenNotas has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Logseq and OpenNotas?

Logseq is written in Clojure and OpenNotas in Vue. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Logseq or OpenNotas?

Choose Logseq if you want the larger community (44,955 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose OpenNotas if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.