head to head · open source

Logseq vs nocturne_memory

Logseq has 44,972 GitHub stars, 2,815 forks, 942 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nocturne_memory has 1,359 stars, 168 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. Logseq leads on adoption by 3,209% (44,972 vs 1,359 stars). Logseq is written in Clojure under AGPL-3.0; nocturne_memory is written in Python under MIT. Logseq has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, nocturne_memory 12%. Logseq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Logseq ★ 45K nocturne_memory ★ 1.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Logseq nocturne_memory
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 1.4K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Clojure Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-27
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 168
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Logseq if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Clojure
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Logseq profile →

pick nocturne_memory if

  • You want the nocturne_memory feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and nocturne_memory fits your workflow better

full nocturne_memory profile →

About Logseq

Logseq is an open source, privacy first knowledge management platform built for local first workflows. It runs as a desktop application and web interface, storing data locally in Markdown or Org mode files, with optional SQLite backed DB graphs for advanced features. The project lives in the Clojure/ClojureScript ecosystem and is licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full Logseq overview →

About nocturne_memory

Nocturne Memory is an MIT licensed, Python based Long Term Memory Server that speaks the Model Context Protocol, giving MCP capable agents persistent, structured, rollbackable memory across sessions, models and tools — built for anyone running Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Codex or another MCP client who is tired of an agent that forgets who it is.

read the full nocturne_memory overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Logseq vs AppFlowy Logseq vs Memos Logseq vs Joplin Logseq vs SiYuan Logseq vs Outline Logseq vs Open-Notebook Logseq vs Khoj Logseq vs Docmost Logseq vs Tolaria Logseq vs SurfSense Logseq vs Zotero Logseq vs Notesnook

Frequently asked questions

Is Logseq or nocturne_memory more popular?

Logseq has 44,972 GitHub stars and nocturne_memory has 1,359. Logseq has the larger community by that measure.

Are Logseq and nocturne_memory free?

Both are open source. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and nocturne_memory under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Logseq and nocturne_memory?

Logseq is written in Clojure and nocturne_memory in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Logseq or nocturne_memory?

Choose Logseq if you want the larger community (44,972 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose nocturne_memory if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.