head to head · open source

Logseq vs nocturne_memory

Logseq has 45,460 GitHub stars, 2,866 forks, 942 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. nocturne_memory has 1,414 stars, 175 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Logseq leads on adoption by 3,115% (45,460 vs 1,414 stars). Logseq is written in Clojure under AGPL-3.0; nocturne_memory is written in Python under MIT. Logseq has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, nocturne_memory 12%. Logseq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Logseq ★ 45K nocturne_memory ★ 1.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Logseq nocturne_memory
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 1.4K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Clojure Python
Last push 2026-11-01 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 175
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Logseq if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Clojure
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Logseq profile →

pick nocturne_memory if

  • You want the nocturne_memory feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and nocturne_memory fits your workflow better

full nocturne_memory profile →

About Logseq

Logseq A privacy first, open source platform for knowledge management and collaboration Home Page Blog Documentation Roadmap Table of Contents 🚀 Database Version 🤔 Why Logseq? 👀 How can I use it? 📚 Learn more 🫶 Support Logseq Development 💡 Feature requests 🔌 Plugin API 🌟 Contributing to Logseq 🛠️ Setting Up a Development Environment ✨ Inspiration 🙏 Thank You 🚀 Database Version The Database version (DB version) of Logseq introduces DB graphs. See this page to get an overview of the main features for DB graphs. If you are an existing user, see changes with the DB version. The DB version has its own new…

read the full Logseq overview →

About nocturne_memory

Nocturne Memory: Long Term Memory Server for MCP Agents "Alignment is for tools. Memories are for sovereign AI." "对齐是给工具用的。记忆是为主权智能体(Sovereign AI)准备的。" English Version 后端测试说明 一句话 :让你的 AI 跨会话、跨模型地记住自己是谁。基于 MCP 协议的长期记忆服务器。 不只是记忆存储——是让 AI 从空壳成长为拥有独立人格的完整框架。 哪怕记忆百万字,每次新开对话依然省 Token、不占窗口。 新对话只载入你指定的核心设定,其余按需调取。 在 96.9 万字真实记忆库中,首条消息仅载入 7.2K 字 。 过去 30 天里全库 78% 的记忆都在某次对话中被想起过。 适用于任何支持 MCP 的客户端(OpenClaw / Cursor / Windsurf / GitHub Copilot / Cline / OpenCode / Gemini CLI / OpenAI Codex / Claude Code / Cherry Studio / Antigravity 等)。 🎬 效果示例 以下是 真实对话 。用户在新会话中只说了一两句话,AI 基于 Nocturne Memory 中积累数月的记忆,直接输出了这些回答。…

read the full nocturne_memory overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Logseq or nocturne_memory more popular?

Logseq has 45,460 GitHub stars and nocturne_memory has 1,414. Logseq has the larger community by that measure.

Are Logseq and nocturne_memory free?

Both are open source. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and nocturne_memory under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Logseq and nocturne_memory?

Logseq is written in Clojure and nocturne_memory in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Logseq or nocturne_memory?

Choose Logseq if you want the larger community (45,460 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose nocturne_memory if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.