head to head · open source

Logseq vs Beaver Notes

Logseq has 44,955 GitHub stars, 2,815 forks, 942 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Beaver Notes has 1,344 stars, 65 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Logseq leads on adoption by 3,245% (44,955 vs 1,344 stars). Logseq is written in Clojure under AGPL-3.0; Beaver Notes is written in JavaScript under MIT. Logseq has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Beaver Notes 5%. Logseq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Logseq ★ 45K Beaver Notes ★ 1.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Logseq Beaver Notes
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 1.3K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Clojure JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 65
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Logseq if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Clojure
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Logseq profile →

pick Beaver Notes if

  • You want the Beaver Notes feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Beaver Notes fits your workflow better

full Beaver Notes profile →

About Logseq

Logseq is an open source, privacy first knowledge management platform built for local first workflows. It runs as a desktop application and web interface, storing data locally in Markdown or Org mode files, with optional SQLite backed DB graphs for advanced features. The project lives in the Clojure/ClojureScript ecosystem and is licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full Logseq overview →

About Beaver Notes

Beaver Notes is an open source, local first workspace for notes, projects, and meetings. It is a JavaScript application under the MIT license, and it presents itself as a privacy focused note taking tool. The core idea is that notes stay on the user's device unless the user explicitly chooses a sync method.

read the full Beaver Notes overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

appflowy vs logseq appflowy vs memos appflowy vs joplin appflowy vs siyuan memos vs joplin appflowy vs outline appflowy vs open-notebook appflowy vs khoj n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Logseq vs AppFlowy Logseq vs Memos Logseq vs Joplin Logseq vs SiYuan Logseq vs Outline Logseq vs Open-Notebook Logseq vs Khoj Logseq vs Docmost Logseq vs Tolaria Logseq vs SurfSense Logseq vs Zotero Logseq vs Notesnook

Frequently asked questions

Is Logseq or Beaver Notes more popular?

Logseq has 44,955 GitHub stars and Beaver Notes has 1,344. Logseq has the larger community by that measure.

Are Logseq and Beaver Notes free?

Both are open source. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Beaver Notes under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Logseq and Beaver Notes?

Logseq is written in Clojure and Beaver Notes in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Logseq or Beaver Notes?

Choose Logseq if you want the larger community (44,955 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Beaver Notes if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.