head to head · open source
local-deep-research vs synology-api
local-deep-research has 9,503 GitHub stars, 903 forks, 889 open issues and last shipped today. synology-api has 608 stars, 168 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. local-deep-research leads on adoption by 1,463% (9,503 vs 608 stars). local-deep-research is written in Python under MIT; synology-api is written in Python under MIT. local-deep-research has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, synology-api 28%. local-deep-research was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| local-deep-research | synology-api | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.5K | ★ 608 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-05 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 903 | ⑂ 168 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick local-deep-research if
- You weight community size — 9.5K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick synology-api if
- You want the synology-api feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and synology-api fits your workflow better
About local-deep-research
Local Deep Research AI powered research assistant for deep, agentic research Performs deep, agentic research using multiple LLMs and search engines with proper citations 🧪 First open source project — fully local on a single RTX 3090 (Qwen3.6 27B) — to report 95% SimpleQA (n=500) and 77% xbench DeepSearch (n=100) on local hardware. See the r/LocalLLaMA announcement and the benchmark dataset. ▶️ Watch Review by The Art Of The Terminal 🚀 What is Local Deep Research? AI research assistant you control. Run locally for privacy, use any LLM and build your own searchable knowledge base. You own your data and see…
read the full local-deep-research overview →
About synology-api
Synology Wrapper If you find yourself here, most probably you are trying to develop something for your NAS, this wrapper might come to your help to build your script. I would like to specify that I do this for hobby as is my passion and in my little free time. Said this, there is no warranties chained and this library is provided "As Is", you will find many things can be simplified, and I slowly will but feel free to Contribute. Premise I've tried this wrapper only with python3 . I do not know if it actually runs with previous versions Before opening an issue make sure you do your own research, if you are not…
read the full synology-api overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is local-deep-research or synology-api more popular?
local-deep-research has 9,503 GitHub stars and synology-api has 608. local-deep-research has the larger community by that measure.
Are local-deep-research and synology-api free?
Both are open source. local-deep-research is licensed under MIT and synology-api under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between local-deep-research and synology-api?
local-deep-research is written in Python and synology-api in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, local-deep-research or synology-api?
Choose local-deep-research if you want the larger community (9,503 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose synology-api if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.