head to head · open source
Typebot vs local-deep-research
Typebot has 10,605 GitHub stars, 3,244 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. local-deep-research has 9,499 stars, 903 forks, 889 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Typebot leads on adoption by 12% (10,605 vs 9,499 stars). Typebot is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; local-deep-research is written in Python under MIT. Typebot has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, local-deep-research 10%. local-deep-research was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Typebot | local-deep-research | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 11K | ★ 9.5K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-26 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 903 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Typebot if
- You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick local-deep-research if
- You want the local-deep-research feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and local-deep-research fits your workflow better
About Typebot
Typebot is a Fair Source chatbot builder. It allows you to create advanced chatbots visually, embed them anywhere on your web/mobile apps, and collect results in real time Try Typebot • Docs Builder demo Features Typebot makes it easy to create advanced chatbots. It provides the building blocks that are adaptable to any business use case. I improve Typebot regularly with bug fixes, new features, and performance improvements. Chat builder with 34+ building blocks such as: 💬 Bubbles: Text, Image / GIF, video, audio, embed. 🔤 Inputs: Text, email, phone number, buttons, picture choice, date picker, payment…
read the full Typebot overview →
About local-deep-research
Local Deep Research AI powered research assistant for deep, agentic research Performs deep, agentic research using multiple LLMs and search engines with proper citations 🧪 First open source project — fully local on a single RTX 3090 (Qwen3.6 27B) — to report 95% SimpleQA (n=500) and 77% xbench DeepSearch (n=100) on local hardware. See the r/LocalLLaMA announcement and the benchmark dataset. ▶️ Watch Review by The Art Of The Terminal 🚀 What is Local Deep Research? AI research assistant you control. Run locally for privacy, use any LLM and build your own searchable knowledge base. You own your data and see…
read the full local-deep-research overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Typebot or local-deep-research more popular?
Typebot has 10,605 GitHub stars and local-deep-research has 9,499. Typebot has the larger community by that measure.
Are Typebot and local-deep-research free?
Both are open source. Typebot has no licence declared in this registry, and local-deep-research is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Typebot and local-deep-research?
Typebot is written in TypeScript and local-deep-research in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Typebot or local-deep-research?
Choose Typebot if you want the larger community (10,605 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose local-deep-research if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.