head to head · open source
local-deep-research vs magic
local-deep-research has 9,109 GitHub stars, 824 forks, 889 open issues and last shipped yesterday. magic has 1,192 stars, 176 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. local-deep-research leads on adoption by 664% (9,109 vs 1,192 stars). local-deep-research is written in Python under MIT; magic is written in C# under MIT. local-deep-research has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, magic 15%. local-deep-research was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| local-deep-research | magic | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.1K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | C# |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 824 | ⑂ 176 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick local-deep-research if
- You weight community size — 9.1K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick magic if
- You want the magic feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and magic fits your workflow better
About local-deep-research
Local Deep Research is an MIT licensed, Python based AI research assistant that performs deep, agentic research with proper citations across any local or cloud LLM and more than ten search engines, built for researchers, developers, and privacy conscious self hosters who want both the workload and the data to stay on hardware they control.
read the full local-deep-research overview →
About magic
Magic is an MIT licensed low code platform and MCP server, written in C for .NET 10, that turns plain English into a working full stack application — database, secure API, business logic and frontend — running on your own hardware with no vendor lock in.
read the full magic overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is local-deep-research or magic more popular?
local-deep-research has 9,109 GitHub stars and magic has 1,192. local-deep-research has the larger community by that measure.
Are local-deep-research and magic free?
Both are open source. local-deep-research is licensed under MIT and magic under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between local-deep-research and magic?
local-deep-research is written in Python and magic in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, local-deep-research or magic?
Choose local-deep-research if you want the larger community (9,109 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose magic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.