head to head · open source
local-deep-research vs magic
local-deep-research has 9,499 GitHub stars, 903 forks, 889 open issues and last shipped yesterday. magic has 1,220 stars, 178 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. local-deep-research leads on adoption by 679% (9,499 vs 1,220 stars). local-deep-research is written in Python under MIT; magic is written in C# under MIT. local-deep-research has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, magic 15%. local-deep-research was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| local-deep-research | magic | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.5K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 903 | ⑂ 178 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick local-deep-research if
- You weight community size — 9.5K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick magic if
- You want the magic feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and magic fits your workflow better
About local-deep-research
Local Deep Research AI powered research assistant for deep, agentic research Performs deep, agentic research using multiple LLMs and search engines with proper citations 🧪 First open source project — fully local on a single RTX 3090 (Qwen3.6 27B) — to report 95% SimpleQA (n=500) and 77% xbench DeepSearch (n=100) on local hardware. See the r/LocalLLaMA announcement and the benchmark dataset. ▶️ Watch Review by The Art Of The Terminal 🚀 What is Local Deep Research? AI research assistant you control. Run locally for privacy, use any LLM and build your own searchable knowledge base. You own your data and see…
read the full local-deep-research overview →
About magic
Instant SECURE Full Stack Apps and AI Agents Turn plain English into a working full stack app — database, secure API, business logic, and frontend — running on your own hardware , with zero lock in . An open source alternative to Lovable, Bolt, and Replit that gives you the whole backend, plus an MCP server that turns every endpoint into a tool for Claude, Cursor, or Codex. Read more about Hyperlambda. [ ] Run it in 60 seconds Then open localhost:5555 , point it at localhost:4444 , and log in with root / root . Point the API Wizard at your database, and it generates a complete, secured REST API — then extend it…
read the full magic overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is local-deep-research or magic more popular?
local-deep-research has 9,499 GitHub stars and magic has 1,220. local-deep-research has the larger community by that measure.
Are local-deep-research and magic free?
Both are open source. local-deep-research is licensed under MIT and magic under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between local-deep-research and magic?
local-deep-research is written in Python and magic in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, local-deep-research or magic?
Choose local-deep-research if you want the larger community (9,499 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose magic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.