head to head · open source
LiveKit vs sequential-workflow-designer
LiveKit has 22,027 GitHub stars, 2,529 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. sequential-workflow-designer has 1,483 stars, 151 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. LiveKit leads on adoption by 1,385% (22,027 vs 1,483 stars). LiveKit is written in Go under Apache-2.0; sequential-workflow-designer is written in TypeScript under MIT. LiveKit has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, sequential-workflow-designer 10%. LiveKit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LiveKit | sequential-workflow-designer | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 22K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-09-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.5K | ⑂ 151 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LiveKit if
- You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick sequential-workflow-designer if
- You want the sequential-workflow-designer feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and sequential-workflow-designer fits your workflow better
About LiveKit
LiveKit: Realtime infrastructure for voice, video, and AI agents LiveKit is an open source platform for building voice, video, and physical AI agents. This repository is the LiveKit server: a scalable, distributed WebRTC SFU that moves realtime audio, video, and data between people, devices, and AI models. The SDKs, agents frameworks, and companion services are linked in the table at the bottom of this page. LiveKit's server is written in Go, using the awesome Pion WebRTC implementation. [!IMPORTANT] If you're building Voice AI, LiveKit Agents is the SDK for code first realtime voice agents. STT, LLM, TTS, turn…
read the full LiveKit overview →
About sequential-workflow-designer
Sequential Workflow Designer A sequential workflow designer with no external dependencies for web applications. It is written in pure TypeScript and uses SVG for rendering. This designer is not associated with any workflow engine; it is fully generic. You can use it to create any kind of application, from graphical programming languages to workflow builders. Features: No external dependencies Fully generic and configurable Supports light, dark, and soft themes, with easy customization Compatible with modern browsers and mobile devices Definitions are stored as JSON Supports Angular, React and Svelte. 📝 Check…
read the full sequential-workflow-designer overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LiveKit or sequential-workflow-designer more popular?
LiveKit has 22,027 GitHub stars and sequential-workflow-designer has 1,483. LiveKit has the larger community by that measure.
Are LiveKit and sequential-workflow-designer free?
Both are open source. LiveKit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and sequential-workflow-designer under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between LiveKit and sequential-workflow-designer?
LiveKit is written in Go and sequential-workflow-designer in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LiveKit or sequential-workflow-designer?
Choose LiveKit if you want the larger community (22,027 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose sequential-workflow-designer if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.