head to head · open source

Kilo vs lite-xl

Kilo has 27,369 GitHub stars, 3,178 forks, 586 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lite-xl has 6,390 stars, 317 forks, 330 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Kilo leads on adoption by 328% (27,369 vs 6,390 stars). Kilo is written in TypeScript under MIT; lite-xl is written in Lua under MIT. Kilo has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, lite-xl 5%. Kilo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Kilo ★ 27K lite-xl ★ 6.4K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Kilo lite-xl
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 6.4K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Lua
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-03-11
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 317
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Kilo if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Kilo profile →

pick lite-xl if

  • You want the lite-xl feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You evaluated both and lite-xl fits your workflow better

full lite-xl profile →

About Kilo

Kilo is an open source AI coding agent platform that integrates into VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, the CLI, and cloud environments. It enables developers to build, ship, and iterate faster by acting as an autonomous or semi autonomous coding assistant across their entire workflow. Built in TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it supports 500+ models—including GPT 5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview—without vendor lock in or markup.

read the full Kilo overview →

About lite-xl

Lite XL is a lightweight text editor written mostly in Lua and built on SDL2, released under the MIT licence for developers who want a small, fast, extensible editor whose entire source they can read and change.

read the full lite-xl overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

react vs kilocode react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

Kilo vs vscode Kilo vs Neovim Kilo vs Zed Kilo vs code-server Kilo vs helix Kilo vs vscodium Kilo vs NvChad Kilo vs CodeEdit Kilo vs opcode Kilo vs devpod Kilo vs terax-ai Kilo vs react-ace

Frequently asked questions

Is Kilo or lite-xl more popular?

Kilo has 27,369 GitHub stars and lite-xl has 6,390. Kilo has the larger community by that measure.

Are Kilo and lite-xl free?

Both are open source. Kilo is licensed under MIT and lite-xl under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Kilo and lite-xl?

Kilo is written in TypeScript and lite-xl in Lua. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Kilo or lite-xl?

Choose Kilo if you want the larger community (27,369 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lite-xl if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.