head to head · open source

Kilo vs CodeEdit

Kilo has 27,341 GitHub stars, 3,165 forks, 586 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CodeEdit has 23,033 stars, 1,193 forks, 213 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Kilo leads on adoption by 19% (27,341 vs 23,033 stars). Kilo is written in TypeScript under MIT; CodeEdit is written in Swift under MIT. Kilo has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, CodeEdit 5%. Kilo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Kilo ★ 27K CodeEdit ★ 23K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Kilo CodeEdit
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 23K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Swift
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-18
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Kilo if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Kilo profile →

pick CodeEdit if

  • You want the CodeEdit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and CodeEdit fits your workflow better

full CodeEdit profile →

About Kilo

Kilo is an open source AI coding agent platform that integrates into VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, the CLI, and cloud environments. It enables developers to build, ship, and iterate faster by acting as an autonomous or semi autonomous coding assistant across their entire workflow. Built in TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it supports 500+ models—including GPT 5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview—without vendor lock in or markup.

read the full Kilo overview →

About CodeEdit

CodeEdit is a code editor for macOS. It is written in Swift, released under the MIT license, and described as a community project. The GitHub description says the app is open source and free forever. The project aims to provide a native editing experience for developers who work on software outside Apple platform projects.

read the full CodeEdit overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit langflow vs kilocode opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed neovim vs zed opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby langflow vs supabase langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs appsmith langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

Kilo vs Neovim Kilo vs Zed

Frequently asked questions

Is Kilo or CodeEdit more popular?

Kilo has 27,341 GitHub stars and CodeEdit has 23,033. Kilo has the larger community by that measure.

Are Kilo and CodeEdit free?

Both are open source. Kilo is licensed under MIT and CodeEdit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Kilo and CodeEdit?

Kilo is written in TypeScript and CodeEdit in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Kilo or CodeEdit?

Choose Kilo if you want the larger community (27,341 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose CodeEdit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.