head to head · open source

Listmonk vs Wraps

Listmonk has 23,471 GitHub stars, 2,604 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Wraps has 59 stars, 8 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Listmonk leads on adoption by 39,681% (23,471 vs 59 stars). Listmonk is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; Wraps is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Listmonk has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Wraps 14%. Wraps was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Listmonk ★ 23K Wraps ★ 59 category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Listmonk Wraps
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 59
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 8
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Listmonk if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Listmonk profile →

pick Wraps if

  • You want the Wraps feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Wraps fits your workflow better

full Wraps profile →

About Listmonk

Listmonk is a standalone, self hosted newsletter and mailing list manager in the open source business software and marketing customer engagement ecosystem. It packages campaign management, subscriber management, and email delivery controls into a single binary application with a modern dashboard, and it uses PostgreSQL as its data store.

read the full Listmonk overview →

About Wraps

Wraps is a code first email platform that deploys its infrastructure into your own AWS account. It lives in the AWS and TypeScript ecosystem, and it ships as a command line tool, a set of SDKs, and an agent facing MCP server. The core idea is that sending email does not require handing your data or your billing to a third party: one CLI command provisions the resources, and the application talks to them through a typed client. SMS through AWS End User Messaging, and CDN delivery over S3 and CloudFront, follow the same pattern.

read the full Wraps overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs dbt plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

Listmonk vs duckdb Listmonk vs Krayin Listmonk vs goaccess Listmonk vs excelize Listmonk vs claude-seo Listmonk vs Billion Mail Listmonk vs BillionMail Listmonk vs dbt Listmonk vs trino Listmonk vs starrocks Listmonk vs perspective Listmonk vs Kutt

Frequently asked questions

Is Listmonk or Wraps more popular?

Listmonk has 23,471 GitHub stars and Wraps has 59. Listmonk has the larger community by that measure.

Are Listmonk and Wraps free?

Both are open source. Listmonk is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and Wraps has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Listmonk and Wraps?

Listmonk is written in Go and Wraps in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Listmonk or Wraps?

Choose Listmonk if you want the larger community (23,471 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Wraps if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.