head to head · open source

Listmonk vs goaccess

Listmonk has 23,471 GitHub stars, 2,604 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. goaccess has 20,930 stars, 1,193 forks, 449 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Listmonk leads on adoption by 12% (23,471 vs 20,930 stars). Listmonk is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; goaccess is written in C under MIT. Listmonk has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, goaccess 6%. goaccess was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Listmonk ★ 23K goaccess ★ 21K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Listmonk goaccess
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 21K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Listmonk if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Listmonk profile →

pick goaccess if

  • You want the goaccess feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and goaccess fits your workflow better

full goaccess profile →

About Listmonk

Listmonk is a standalone, self hosted newsletter and mailing list manager in the open source business software and marketing customer engagement ecosystem. It packages campaign management, subscriber management, and email delivery controls into a single binary application with a modern dashboard, and it uses PostgreSQL as its data store.

read the full Listmonk overview →

About goaccess

GoAccess is an open source, real time web log analyzer and interactive viewer written in C and released under the MIT license. It parses web server logs and renders the results either in a terminal on nix systems or through a browser, updating every panel and metric every 200 milliseconds in the terminal output and every second in the HTML output. The project has been developed for roughly thirteen years and lives in the nix command line ecosystem, with a cluster of topics around analytics, Apache, Caddy, dashboards, and command line tooling.

read the full goaccess overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs dbt plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

Listmonk vs duckdb Listmonk vs Krayin Listmonk vs excelize Listmonk vs claude-seo Listmonk vs Billion Mail Listmonk vs BillionMail Listmonk vs dbt Listmonk vs trino Listmonk vs starrocks Listmonk vs perspective Listmonk vs Kutt Listmonk vs Mautic

Frequently asked questions

Is Listmonk or goaccess more popular?

Listmonk has 23,471 GitHub stars and goaccess has 20,930. Listmonk has the larger community by that measure.

Are Listmonk and goaccess free?

Both are open source. Listmonk is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and goaccess under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Listmonk and goaccess?

Listmonk is written in Go and goaccess in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Listmonk or goaccess?

Choose Listmonk if you want the larger community (23,471 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose goaccess if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.