head to head · open source

Listmonk vs TechShare

Listmonk has 23,471 GitHub stars, 2,604 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. TechShare has 799 stars, 76 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Listmonk leads on adoption by 2,838% (23,471 vs 799 stars). Listmonk is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; TechShare is written in Vue under GPL-3.0. Listmonk has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, TechShare 10%. Listmonk was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (newsletter), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Listmonk ★ 23K TechShare ★ 799 category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Listmonk TechShare
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 799
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go Vue
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-04-02
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 76
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Listmonk if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Listmonk profile →

pick TechShare if

  • You want the TechShare feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You evaluated both and TechShare fits your workflow better

full TechShare profile →

About Listmonk

Listmonk is a standalone, self hosted newsletter and mailing list manager in the open source business software and marketing customer engagement ecosystem. It packages campaign management, subscriber management, and email delivery controls into a single binary application with a modern dashboard, and it uses PostgreSQL as its data store.

read the full Listmonk overview →

About TechShare

TechShare is Vue GPL 3.0 GitHub repository and homepage site. It shares efficiency methods, quality articles, programming knowledge, practical tools, interesting content. It lives in GitHub open source documentation ecosystem. Category: Business Software / Marketing & Customer Engagement. Topics include articles, guide, java, javascript, netcore, newsletter, share, tools.

read the full TechShare overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs dbt plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

Listmonk vs duckdb Listmonk vs Krayin Listmonk vs goaccess Listmonk vs excelize Listmonk vs claude-seo Listmonk vs Billion Mail Listmonk vs BillionMail Listmonk vs dbt Listmonk vs trino Listmonk vs starrocks Listmonk vs perspective Listmonk vs Kutt

Frequently asked questions

Is Listmonk or TechShare more popular?

Listmonk has 23,471 GitHub stars and TechShare has 799. Listmonk has the larger community by that measure.

Are Listmonk and TechShare free?

Both are open source. Listmonk is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and TechShare under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Listmonk and TechShare?

Listmonk is written in Go and TechShare in Vue. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Listmonk or TechShare?

Choose Listmonk if you want the larger community (23,471 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose TechShare if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.