head to head · open source

Listmonk vs line-harness-oss

Listmonk has 23,471 GitHub stars, 2,604 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. line-harness-oss has 592 stars, 383 forks, 50 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. Listmonk leads on adoption by 3,865% (23,471 vs 592 stars). Listmonk is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; line-harness-oss is written in TypeScript under MIT. Listmonk has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, line-harness-oss 65%. Listmonk was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Listmonk ★ 23K line-harness-oss ★ 592 category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Listmonk line-harness-oss
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 592
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-11
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 383
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Listmonk if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Listmonk profile →

pick line-harness-oss if

  • You want the line-harness-oss feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and line-harness-oss fits your workflow better

full line-harness-oss profile →

About Listmonk

Listmonk is a standalone, self hosted newsletter and mailing list manager in the open source business software and marketing customer engagement ecosystem. It packages campaign management, subscriber management, and email delivery controls into a single binary application with a modern dashboard, and it uses PostgreSQL as its data store.

read the full Listmonk overview →

About line-harness-oss

L Harness is a self hosted, MIT licensed CRM for LINE Official Accounts, written in TypeScript and deployed on Cloudflare Workers with a D1 database, aimed at teams that want step messaging, broadcasts, forms and reservations without paying a monthly platform fee.

read the full line-harness-oss overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs dbt plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

Listmonk vs duckdb Listmonk vs Krayin Listmonk vs goaccess Listmonk vs excelize Listmonk vs claude-seo Listmonk vs Billion Mail Listmonk vs BillionMail Listmonk vs dbt Listmonk vs trino Listmonk vs starrocks Listmonk vs perspective Listmonk vs Kutt

Frequently asked questions

Is Listmonk or line-harness-oss more popular?

Listmonk has 23,471 GitHub stars and line-harness-oss has 592. Listmonk has the larger community by that measure.

Are Listmonk and line-harness-oss free?

Both are open source. Listmonk is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and line-harness-oss under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Listmonk and line-harness-oss?

Listmonk is written in Go and line-harness-oss in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Listmonk or line-harness-oss?

Choose Listmonk if you want the larger community (23,471 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose line-harness-oss if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.