head to head · open source

Listmonk vs Dittofeed

Listmonk has 23,471 GitHub stars, 2,604 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Dittofeed has 2,947 stars, 387 forks, 51 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Listmonk leads on adoption by 696% (23,471 vs 2,947 stars). Listmonk is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; Dittofeed is written in TypeScript under MIT. Listmonk has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Dittofeed 13%. Listmonk was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Listmonk ★ 23K Dittofeed ★ 2.9K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Listmonk Dittofeed
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 2.9K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-03-28
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 387
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Listmonk if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Listmonk profile →

pick Dittofeed if

  • You want the Dittofeed feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Dittofeed fits your workflow better

full Dittofeed profile →

About Listmonk

Listmonk is a standalone, self hosted newsletter and mailing list manager in the open source business software and marketing customer engagement ecosystem. It packages campaign management, subscriber management, and email delivery controls into a single binary application with a modern dashboard, and it uses PostgreSQL as its data store.

read the full Listmonk overview →

About Dittofeed

Dittofeed is an open source, MIT licensed omni channel customer engagement platform, written in TypeScript, that sends broadcasts and automated user journeys across email, SMS, mobile push, WhatsApp, Slack, and other channels — built for developers and product teams who want to own their messaging infrastructure instead of renting it.

read the full Dittofeed overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs dbt plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

Listmonk vs duckdb Listmonk vs Krayin Listmonk vs goaccess Listmonk vs excelize Listmonk vs claude-seo Listmonk vs Billion Mail Listmonk vs BillionMail Listmonk vs dbt Listmonk vs trino Listmonk vs starrocks Listmonk vs perspective Listmonk vs Kutt

Frequently asked questions

Is Listmonk or Dittofeed more popular?

Listmonk has 23,471 GitHub stars and Dittofeed has 2,947. Listmonk has the larger community by that measure.

Are Listmonk and Dittofeed free?

Both are open source. Listmonk is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Dittofeed under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Listmonk and Dittofeed?

Listmonk is written in Go and Dittofeed in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Listmonk or Dittofeed?

Choose Listmonk if you want the larger community (23,471 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Dittofeed if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.