head to head · open source
Listmonk vs Contentport
Listmonk has 24,124 GitHub stars, 2,742 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Contentport has 772 stars, 108 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. Listmonk leads on adoption by 3,025% (24,124 vs 772 stars). Listmonk is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; Contentport is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Listmonk has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Contentport 14%. Listmonk was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Listmonk | Contentport | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 24K | ★ 772 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2025-12-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 108 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Listmonk if
- You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Contentport if
- You want the Contentport feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Contentport fits your workflow better
About Listmonk
listmonk is a standalone, self hosted, newsletter and mailing list manager. It is fast, feature rich, and packed into a single binary. It uses a PostgreSQL database as its data store. Visit listmonk.app for more info. Check out the live demo . Installation Docker The latest image is available on DockerHub at listmonk/listmonk:latest . Download and use the sample docker compose.yml. Visit See installation docs Binary Download the latest release and extract the listmonk binary. ./listmonk new config to generate config.toml. Edit it. ./listmonk install to setup the Postgres DB (or upgrade to upgrade an existing DB…
read the full Listmonk overview →
About Contentport
contentport — public roadmap (last updated: 29th Nov 2025) Features in Pipeline Priority 1 Dark mode (requested by many users) Responsive layout (requested by many users) Community posting (requested by many users) Proactively create posts for users (requested by many users) Native code snippet editor (Raycast style) — personal wish (Jo) Accurate character limit handling for free Twitter users (necessary for UX) Auto plug (potentially useful feature) Timezone selection (requested by many users) Clarify whether scheduled times reflect: Local timezone UTC Or something else Display the active timezone clearly…
read the full Contentport overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Listmonk or Contentport more popular?
Listmonk has 24,124 GitHub stars and Contentport has 772. Listmonk has the larger community by that measure.
Are Listmonk and Contentport free?
Both are open source. Listmonk is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Contentport under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Listmonk and Contentport?
Listmonk is written in Go and Contentport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Listmonk or Contentport?
Choose Listmonk if you want the larger community (24,124 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Contentport if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.