head to head · open source

Listmonk vs Contentport

Listmonk has 23,471 GitHub stars, 2,604 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Contentport has 765 stars, 107 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. Listmonk leads on adoption by 2,968% (23,471 vs 765 stars). Listmonk is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; Contentport is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Listmonk has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Contentport 14%. Listmonk was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Listmonk ★ 23K Contentport ★ 765 category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Listmonk Contentport
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 765
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-13 2025-12-12
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 107
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Listmonk if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Listmonk profile →

pick Contentport if

  • You want the Contentport feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Contentport fits your workflow better

full Contentport profile →

About Listmonk

Listmonk is a standalone, self hosted newsletter and mailing list manager in the open source business software and marketing customer engagement ecosystem. It packages campaign management, subscriber management, and email delivery controls into a single binary application with a modern dashboard, and it uses PostgreSQL as its data store.

read the full Listmonk overview →

About Contentport

Contentport is an open source content platform for technical founders, positioned as a content engine for growing on Twitter at scale. It is written in TypeScript, licensed under AGPL 3.0, and listed under Business Software / Marketing & Customer Engagement. Its public roadmap describes scheduling, assistant prompts, thread creation, image handling, timezone behavior, and workspace isolation.

read the full Contentport overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs dbt plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

Listmonk vs duckdb Listmonk vs Krayin Listmonk vs goaccess Listmonk vs excelize Listmonk vs claude-seo Listmonk vs Billion Mail Listmonk vs BillionMail Listmonk vs dbt Listmonk vs trino Listmonk vs starrocks Listmonk vs perspective Listmonk vs Kutt

Frequently asked questions

Is Listmonk or Contentport more popular?

Listmonk has 23,471 GitHub stars and Contentport has 765. Listmonk has the larger community by that measure.

Are Listmonk and Contentport free?

Both are open source. Listmonk is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Contentport under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Listmonk and Contentport?

Listmonk is written in Go and Contentport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Listmonk or Contentport?

Choose Listmonk if you want the larger community (23,471 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Contentport if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.