head to head · open source

lapce vs web-maker

lapce has 38,860 GitHub stars, 1,333 forks, 901 open issues and last shipped today. web-maker has 2,699 stars, 324 forks, 120 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. lapce leads on adoption by 1,340% (38,860 vs 2,699 stars). lapce is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; web-maker is written in JavaScript under MIT. lapce has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, web-maker 12%. lapce was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (code-editor), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lapce ★ 39K web-maker ★ 2.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

lapce web-maker
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 2.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Rust JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-08-03
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 324
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lapce if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lapce profile →

pick web-maker if

  • You want the web-maker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and web-maker fits your workflow better

full web-maker profile →

About lapce

Lapce is an Apache 2.0 licensed, native graphical code editor written in pure Rust for developers who want fast text editing, built in language intelligence, Vim style modal editing, and remote development support inside one application rather than assembled from a base editor plus a stack of extensions.

read the full lapce overview →

About web-maker

Web Maker is an MIT licensed, offline frontend code editor and playground for HTML, CSS and JavaScript experiments that runs entirely on the user's own system, and it is aimed at frontend developers who want CodePen style quick prototyping without a network connection.

read the full web-maker overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

lapce vs ECC lapce vs react lapce vs Langflow lapce vs Supabase lapce vs puppeteer lapce vs archify lapce vs PocketBase lapce vs i-have-adhd lapce vs codebase-memory-mcp lapce vs ToolJet lapce vs AppSmith lapce vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is lapce or web-maker more popular?

lapce has 38,860 GitHub stars and web-maker has 2,699. lapce has the larger community by that measure.

Are lapce and web-maker free?

Both are open source. lapce is licensed under Apache-2.0 and web-maker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lapce and web-maker?

lapce is written in Rust and web-maker in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lapce or web-maker?

Choose lapce if you want the larger community (38,860 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose web-maker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.