head to head · open source

rea vs lapce

rea has 77,033 GitHub stars, 16,456 forks, 70 open issues and last shipped today. lapce has 38,904 stars, 1,347 forks, 901 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rea leads on adoption by 98% (77,033 vs 38,904 stars). rea is written in TypeScript under MIT; lapce is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. rea has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, lapce 3%. rea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rea ★ 77K lapce ★ 39K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rea lapce
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 39K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-10-11 2026-10-09
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rea if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rea profile →

pick lapce if

  • You want the lapce feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and lapce fits your workflow better

full lapce profile →

About rea

REA is an open source MCP server and CLI that lets AI coding agents — and your terminal — reverse engineer native binaries, JavaScript and Electron apps, .NET assemblies, and websites, with evidence attached to every conclusion.

read the full rea overview →

About lapce

Lapce is an Apache 2.0 licensed, native graphical code editor written in pure Rust for developers who want fast text editing, built in language intelligence, Vim style modal editing, and remote development support inside one application rather than assembled from a base editor plus a stack of extensions.

read the full lapce overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 277K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 213K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

rea vs ECC rea vs react rea vs Langflow rea vs Supabase rea vs puppeteer rea vs archify rea vs PocketBase rea vs i-have-adhd rea vs codebase-memory-mcp rea vs herdr rea vs ToolJet rea vs AppSmith

Frequently asked questions

Is rea or lapce more popular?

rea has 77,033 GitHub stars and lapce has 38,904. rea has the larger community by that measure.

Are rea and lapce free?

Both are open source. rea is licensed under MIT and lapce under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rea and lapce?

rea is written in TypeScript and lapce in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rea or lapce?

Choose rea if you want the larger community (77,033 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lapce if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.