head to head · open source

Langflow vs illa-builder

Langflow has 155,507 GitHub stars, 10,180 forks, 1,056 open issues and last shipped today. illa-builder has 12,331 stars, 1,210 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Langflow leads on adoption by 1,161% (155,507 vs 12,331 stars). Langflow is written in Python under MIT; illa-builder is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Langflow has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, illa-builder 10%. Langflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Langflow ★ 156K illa-builder ★ 12K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Langflow illa-builder
GitHub stars ★ 156K ★ 12K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-05-27
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Langflow if

  • You weight community size — 156K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Langflow profile →

pick illa-builder if

  • You want the illa-builder feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and illa-builder fits your workflow better

full illa-builder profile →

About Langflow

Langflow is a visual builder platform for designing, testing, and deploying AI agents and retrieval augmented generation (RAG) pipelines. It lives in the Python based generative AI ecosystem and targets developers building intelligent applications. The project provides a low code interface to assemble components—such as LLMs, vector stores, memory modules, and tools—into executable workflows, while also exposing those workflows as APIs or MCP servers for integration into external applications.

read the full Langflow overview →

About illa-builder

ILLA Builder is an open source low code platform for developers and internal tool teams who want to build dashboards, CRUD apps, admin panels, CRMs and CMSs without hand coding the front end.

read the full illa-builder overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 273K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K pi ★ 113K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs supabase react vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Langflow vs ECC Langflow vs react Langflow vs Supabase Langflow vs puppeteer Langflow vs archify Langflow vs PocketBase Langflow vs i-have-adhd Langflow vs codebase-memory-mcp Langflow vs herdr Langflow vs ToolJet Langflow vs AppSmith Langflow vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is Langflow or illa-builder more popular?

Langflow has 155,507 GitHub stars and illa-builder has 12,331. Langflow has the larger community by that measure.

Are Langflow and illa-builder free?

Both are open source. Langflow is licensed under MIT and illa-builder under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Langflow and illa-builder?

Langflow is written in Python and illa-builder in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Langflow or illa-builder?

Choose Langflow if you want the larger community (155,507 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose illa-builder if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.