head to head · open source
Ladybird vs xmpp.js
Ladybird has 66,481 GitHub stars, 3,165 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped today. xmpp.js has 2,279 stars, 383 forks, 35 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 2,817% (66,481 vs 2,279 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; xmpp.js is written in JavaScript under ISC. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, xmpp.js 17%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | xmpp.js | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 66K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | ISC |
| Written in | C++ | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-12 | 2026-09-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 383 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick xmpp.js if
- You want the xmpp.js feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the ISC license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and xmpp.js fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird is a truly independent web browser and browser engine, written from scratch in C++ rather than as a fork of any existing engine, and it is built for developers who want to work on a browser engine based on web standards while it remains in a pre alpha state.
read the full Ladybird overview →
About xmpp.js
xmpp.js is a modular JavaScript library that lets developers build XMPP chat, presence, and real time messaging clients or components for browsers, Node.js, React Native, and other JavaScript runtimes.
read the full xmpp.js overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or xmpp.js more popular?
Ladybird has 66,481 GitHub stars and xmpp.js has 2,279. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and xmpp.js free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and xmpp.js under ISC. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and xmpp.js?
Ladybird is written in C++ and xmpp.js in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or xmpp.js?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,481 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose xmpp.js if its feature set, stack or ISC licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.