head to head · open source

Ladybird vs WebLibre

Ladybird has 66,237 GitHub stars, 3,163 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. WebLibre has 985 stars, 34 forks, 62 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ladybird leads on adoption by 6,625% (66,237 vs 985 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; WebLibre is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, WebLibre 3%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ladybird ★ 66K WebLibre ★ 985 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ladybird WebLibre
GitHub stars ★ 66K ★ 985
License BSD-2-Clause AGPL-3.0
Written in C++ Dart
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 34
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ladybird if

  • You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ladybird profile →

pick WebLibre if

  • You want the WebLibre feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and WebLibre fits your workflow better

full WebLibre profile →

About Ladybird

Ladybird is a truly independent web browser and browser engine, written from scratch in C++ rather than as a fork of any existing engine, and it is built for developers who want to work on a browser engine based on web standards while it remains in a pre alpha state.

read the full Ladybird overview →

About WebLibre

WebLibre is a libre, privacy first browser for Android built from scratch on Mozilla's Gecko engine and Mozilla Android Components, aimed at Android users who want familiar everyday browsing without giving up control over how sites, identities, and network connections are separated.

read the full WebLibre overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs monaco-editor ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Ladybird vs uBlock Ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp Ladybird vs monaco-editor Ladybird vs Zen Browser Ladybird vs servo Ladybird vs serenity Ladybird vs refined-github Ladybird vs slate Ladybird vs Avalonia Ladybird vs webtorrent Ladybird vs fingerprintjs Ladybird vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is Ladybird or WebLibre more popular?

Ladybird has 66,237 GitHub stars and WebLibre has 985. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ladybird and WebLibre free?

Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and WebLibre under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ladybird and WebLibre?

Ladybird is written in C++ and WebLibre in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ladybird or WebLibre?

Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,237 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose WebLibre if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.