head to head · open source
Ladybird vs search-by-image
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. search-by-image has 3,806 stars, 321 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 1,655% (66,807 vs 3,806 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; search-by-image is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, search-by-image 8%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | search-by-image | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 3.8K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C++ | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 321 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick search-by-image if
- You want the search-by-image feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and search-by-image fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About search-by-image
Search by Image Sponsors Lenso.ai Explore billions of images from all around the web. Search for places, people, duplicates, and more. Supporting the Project The continued development of Search by Image is made possible thanks to the support of awesome backers. If you'd like to join them, please consider contributing with Patreon, PayPal or Bitcoin. Description Search by Image is a browser extension that makes effortless reverse image searches possible, and comes with support for more than 30 search engines. The extension helps journalists and researchers verify the authenticity of images, and assists in the…
read the full search-by-image overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or search-by-image more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and search-by-image has 3,806. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and search-by-image free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and search-by-image under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and search-by-image?
Ladybird is written in C++ and search-by-image in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or search-by-image?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose search-by-image if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.