head to head · open source
Ladybird vs Requestly
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Requestly has 6,761 stars, 685 forks, 274 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ladybird leads on adoption by 888% (66,807 vs 6,761 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; Requestly is written in various languages under a custom or non-standard licence. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Requestly 10%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | Requestly | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 6.8K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Custom / other |
| Written in | C++ | — |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 685 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Requestly if
- You want the Requestly feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- You evaluated both and Requestly fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About Requestly
Requestly API Client Design, Build & Test APIs all in one place. Design, build, and test APIs your way. Git native by default, sync instantly with Team Projects, or self host with enterprise grade security. No cloud lock in. Download · Documentation · Report a bug · Community Why developers pick Requestly API Client 🔒 Complete Data Sovereignty: Choose local, team sync, or self hosted. Your data never leaves your control. 💸 Predictable, Flat Pricing: Free for up to 10 collaborators. Enterprise governance without hidden add ons. ⚡ Lightweight & Developer First: Open. Hit endpoint. Get response. No bloat, no lag…
read the full Requestly overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or Requestly more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and Requestly has 6,761. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and Requestly free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause, and Requestly has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Ladybird and Requestly?
Ladybird is written in C++ and Requestly in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or Requestly?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose Requestly if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.