head to head · open source
Ladybird vs mue
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mue has 772 stars, 89 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 8,554% (66,807 vs 772 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; mue is written in JavaScript under BSD-3-Clause. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, mue 12%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | mue | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 772 |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | BSD-3-Clause |
| Written in | C++ | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 89 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mue if
- You want the mue feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and mue fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About mue
Mue A fast, open and free to use browser extension that gives a new, fresh and customisable tab page to modern browsers. muetab.com 🤔 Why Mue? Beautiful and Minimalist Design Customisable Layout Widgets (such as weather, notes, bookmarks and more) Privacy Focused does not track your browsing activity Extensible with the Mue Marketplace Open Source under the BSD 3 License 🌶️ Installation Mue can be downloaded on the following browsers: Chrome Edge Firefox Whale and can be manually sideloaded on others using the files on GitHub Releases 🚀 Demo A fully featured demo of the tab extension is available in browser…
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or mue more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and mue has 772. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and mue free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and mue under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and mue?
Ladybird is written in C++ and mue in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or mue?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose mue if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.