head to head · open source

Ladybird vs keepassxc-browser

Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. keepassxc-browser has 2,382 stars, 257 forks, 197 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 2,705% (66,807 vs 2,382 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; keepassxc-browser is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, keepassxc-browser 11%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ladybird ★ 67K keepassxc-browser ★ 2.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ladybird keepassxc-browser
GitHub stars ★ 67K ★ 2.4K
License BSD-2-Clause GPL-3.0
Written in C++ JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-28
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 257
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ladybird if

  • You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ladybird profile →

pick keepassxc-browser if

  • You want the keepassxc-browser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and keepassxc-browser fits your workflow better

full keepassxc-browser profile →

About Ladybird

Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…

read the full Ladybird overview →

About keepassxc-browser

KeePassXC Browser Browser extension for KeePassXC with native messaging. Download and use This browser extension was first supported in KeePassXC 2.3.0 (release end of 2017). In general it is advised to only use the latest available release. Get the extension for Firefox or Chrome/Chromium or Microsoft Edge. Please see this document for instructions how to configure KeePassXC in order to connect the database correctly. How it works KeePassXC Browser communicates with KeePassXC through keepassxc proxy . The proxy handles listening to STDIN/STDOUT and transfers these messages through Unix domain sockets / named…

read the full keepassxc-browser overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Ladybird or keepassxc-browser more popular?

Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and keepassxc-browser has 2,382. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ladybird and keepassxc-browser free?

Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and keepassxc-browser under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ladybird and keepassxc-browser?

Ladybird is written in C++ and keepassxc-browser in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ladybird or keepassxc-browser?

Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose keepassxc-browser if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.