head to head · open source
Ladybird vs jose
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. jose has 7,861 stars, 381 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ladybird leads on adoption by 750% (66,807 vs 7,861 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; jose is written in TypeScript under MIT. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, jose 5%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | jose | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 7.9K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | C++ | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 381 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick jose if
- You want the jose feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and jose fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About jose
jose jose is a JavaScript module for JSON Object Signing and Encryption, providing support for JSON Web Tokens (JWT), JSON Web Signature (JWS), JSON Web Encryption (JWE), JSON Web Key (JWK), JSON Web Key Set (JWKS), and more. The module is designed to work across various Web interoperable runtimes including Node.js, browsers, Cloudflare Workers, Deno, Bun, and others. Sponsor If you want to quickly add JWT authentication to JavaScript apps, feel free to check out Auth0's JavaScript SDK and free plan. [Create an Auth0 account; it's free!][sponsor auth0] 💗 Help the project Support from the community to continue…
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or jose more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and jose has 7,861. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and jose free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and jose under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and jose?
Ladybird is written in C++ and jose in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or jose?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose jose if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.