head to head · open source
Ladybird vs flutter_inappwebview
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. flutter_inappwebview has 3,790 stars, 2,160 forks, 214 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 1,663% (66,807 vs 3,790 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; flutter_inappwebview is written in Dart under Apache-2.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, flutter_inappwebview 57%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | flutter_inappwebview | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 3.8K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | C++ | Dart |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-02-10 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 2.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick flutter_inappwebview if
- You want the flutter_inappwebview feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Dart
- You evaluated both and flutter_inappwebview fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About flutter_inappwebview
Flutter InAppWebView Plugin Supported Platforms A Flutter plugin that allows you to add an inline webview, to use an headless webview, and to open an in app browser window. Articles/Resources Official documentation: inappwebview.dev/docs Read the online API Reference to get the full API documentation . Official blog: inappwebview.dev/blog Find open source projects on the Official Showcase page: inappwebview.dev/showcase Check the flutter inappwebview examples repository for project examples Check the flutter inappwebview/example/integration test/webview flutter test.dart file for other code examples Flutter…
read the full flutter_inappwebview overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or flutter_inappwebview more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and flutter_inappwebview has 3,790. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and flutter_inappwebview free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and flutter_inappwebview under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and flutter_inappwebview?
Ladybird is written in C++ and flutter_inappwebview in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or flutter_inappwebview?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose flutter_inappwebview if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.