head to head · open source
Ladybird vs docx
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. docx has 5,982 stars, 621 forks, 162 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ladybird leads on adoption by 1,017% (66,807 vs 5,982 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; docx is written in TypeScript under MIT. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, docx 10%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | docx | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 6.0K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | C++ | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 621 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick docx if
- You want the docx feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and docx fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About docx
Easily generate and modify .docx files with JS/TS. Works for Node and on the Browser. [![NPM version][npm image]][npm url] [![Downloads per month][downloads image]][downloads url] [![GitHub Action Workflow Status][github actions workflow image]][github actions workflow url] [![Known Vulnerabilities][snky image]][snky url] [![PRs Welcome][pr image]][pr url] [![codecov][codecov image]][codecov url] [![Docx.js Editor][docxjs editor image]][docxjs editor url] Demo Browser Here are examples of docx being used with basic HTML/JS in a browser environment: Here are examples of docx working in Angular : Here are examples…
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or docx more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and docx has 5,982. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and docx free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and docx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and docx?
Ladybird is written in C++ and docx in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or docx?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose docx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.