head to head · open source
Ladybird vs daily
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. daily has 20,129 stars, 574 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ladybird leads on adoption by 232% (66,807 vs 20,129 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; daily is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, daily 3%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | daily | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 20K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C++ | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 574 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick daily if
- You want the daily feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and daily fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About daily
Welcome to the daily.dev repository We know how hard it is to be a developer. It doesn't have to be. daily.dev is the homepage every developer deserves. A personalized developer news feed, dev communities, and search. Free, and open source. Much better than what's out there. Maybe ;) [Product Docs][product docs link] · [Changelog][changelog link] · [Report a Bug][report bug link] · [Request a Feature][github discussions link] · [Swag Store][swag store link] · [Brand Assets][brand book link] [![][chrome users shield]][chrome users link] [![][chrome rating shield]][chrome users link] [![][latest version…
read the full daily overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or daily more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and daily has 20,129. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and daily free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and daily under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and daily?
Ladybird is written in C++ and daily in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or daily?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose daily if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.