head to head · open source
Ladybird vs chrome-remote-interface
Ladybird has 66,797 GitHub stars, 3,193 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chrome-remote-interface has 4,558 stars, 324 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 1,365% (66,797 vs 4,558 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; chrome-remote-interface is written in JavaScript under MIT. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, chrome-remote-interface 7%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | chrome-remote-interface | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 4.6K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | C++ | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-02-09 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 324 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chrome-remote-interface if
- You want the chrome-remote-interface feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and chrome-remote-interface fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About chrome-remote-interface
chrome remote interface [Chrome Debugging Protocol] interface that helps to instrument Chrome (or any other suitable implementation) by providing a simple abstraction of commands and notifications using a straightforward JavaScript API. Sample API usage The following snippet loads and dumps every request made: Find more examples in the [wiki]. You may also want to take a look at the [FAQ]. [wiki]: [async await example]: [FAQ]: Installation npm install chrome remote interface Install globally ( g ) to just use the bundled client. Implementations This module should work with every application implementing the…
read the full chrome-remote-interface overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or chrome-remote-interface more popular?
Ladybird has 66,797 GitHub stars and chrome-remote-interface has 4,558. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and chrome-remote-interface free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and chrome-remote-interface under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and chrome-remote-interface?
Ladybird is written in C++ and chrome-remote-interface in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or chrome-remote-interface?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,797 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose chrome-remote-interface if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.